It was none of the above. I typically set my thermals where they are brighter than some people do, so the targets "pop" more. On white hot, which i rarely use, it tends to wash out the background to my eye. Is that what you are seeing?Lance was it foggy and hazy out, or high humidity? Got to be better w an internal recorder and battery packs
Yes it's one of the new ones. I think its the Trail XP38. (1.2x, 17 micron, 640). Pulsar didn't previously make a 640 core scope with internal recording and battery pack. I think they're starting to ship out the production ones.Lancer is this one of the new ones?/one of the ones before these go on the market?
Yes what ^^^ he said.Lancer is this one of the new ones?/one of the ones before these go on the market?
Maybe tonight you are out there filming porks!?? BANG BANG!!
Make sure you are watching it on higher quality than YouTube standard settings, I think the videos look amazing other than being shaky from not being rifle mounted.I think it would be the contrast that he's talking about?
The prototype i have does not record audio, but the production units will.Did you have the audio off or does it not record audio?
Another thing I really like is the fact you can update the firmware via USB instead of sending the unit in.
Lance was it foggy and hazy out, or high humidity? Got to be better w an internal recorder and battery packs
I was told that the trail line would have a microphone, but won't initially record with sound. But there will be a firmware update that will add sound to recording.Another thing I really like is the fact you can update the firmware via USB instead of sending the unit in.
Frank, at 6 minutes and 20 seconds into this video he adjusts the contrast. Not sure if that's what you were asking about, but I think it might be.Lance was it foggy and hazy out, or high humidity? Got to be better w an internal recorder and battery packs
That is of the 384 core 2.1x scope so it is a lower resolution also. I'm also pretty sure the view through the lens is better compared to the videos we are seeing.yeah that is much better, just looks washed out to me and not real sharp or is it suppose to washout the background so you cannot see what is behind what you are shooting? After 6:26 I could see some back ground so maybe that was it...Thanks