This Dan O'Kelly Could Be An Interesting Man To Talk To

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Ratdog68, Jan 2, 2021.



  1. Ratdog68

    Ratdog68 LSB Official Story Teller LSB TURKEY BUZZARD PRESERVATION SOCIETY SUS VENATOR CLUB LoneStarBoars Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2013
    Messages:
    9,201
    Location:
    Seattle (Zombie Central), WA





    Discussion Starter • #1 • 1 h ago (Edited)


    And a copy/paste of a comment within the second video is interesting as well:



    Arkamas Ross
    1 week ago
    The following information needs to spread like fire. Another person made this comment in another video and I repost it here:

    ATF gun laws, ACTS are VOID here is why
    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” 2nd Amendment

    “A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law. The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individual’s rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.” –Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

    “An unconstitutional law is void and is as no law. An offense created by it is not crime. A conviction under it is not merely erroneous but is illegal and void and cannot be used as a legal cause of imprisonment.” – Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1879)

    “An unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office. It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” – Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)

    “In American constitutional law, a statute is void for vagueness and unenforceable if it is too vague for the average citizen to understand or if a term cannot be strictly defined and is not defined anywhere in such law, thus violating the vagueness doctrine. There are several reasons a statute may be considered vague; in general, a statute might be called void for vagueness reasons when an average citizen cannot generally determine what persons are regulated, what conduct is prohibited, or what punishment may be imposed. For example, criminal laws which do not state explicitly and definitely what conduct is punishable are void for vagueness. A statute is also void for vagueness if a legislature's delegation of authority to judges and/or administrators is so extensive that it would lead to arbitrary prosecutions. Related to the "void for vagueness" concept is the "unconstitutional vagueness" concept” - Vagueness Doctrine
    The first ACT The National Firearms Act Is repugnant to the constitution and has been the opening of the floodgates of attacks against our constitution costing millions in litigation and depriving rights under color of law.
    ATF is in violation of
    18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law
    Whoever,
    under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom,
    willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth,
    Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or
    immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the
    United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on
    account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or
    race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined
    under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if
    bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this
    section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened
    use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under
    this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death
    results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such
    acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual
    abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to
    kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of
    years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.!
    The way I see it If a law is passed that directly opposes the
    constitution that
    law is VOID and the passer of the offending law violated their OATH.
    Anyone enforcing those offending laws also violates their oath! If you
    break your Oath you have committed treason! You
    have been deprived your rights under color of law!
    SHALL NOT INFRINGE means NO RESTRICTIONS!
    Synonyms & Antonyms of infringe
    1 as in violate, breach
    Synonyms & Near Synonyms for infringe
    breach, break, violate
    err, fall, offend, sin, stray, transgress, trespass, wander
    backslide, lapse, mess up
    Antonyms & Near Antonyms for infringe
    forgive, justify, pardon
    regret, repent, rue
    2 as in invade, intrude
    Synonyms & Near Synonyms for infringe
    entrench (also intrench), impinge, intrude, invade
    snake, sneak
    overpass, overreach, overrun, overshoot, overstep
    creep, encroach, inch, worm.
    To enforce 18 U.S. Code § 242 you must charge the law maker, and all
    involved personally, for violation of their oath and
    enforcing an unconstitutional law and violation of 18 U.S. Code § 242 .
    National Firearm Act is VOID!
    Firearm Protection Act is VOID and any other ACT opposing the Constitution!
    I am not a gun owner I am just an advocate for our constitutional rights.
    The ATF got a pre-ruling so both sides could prepare arguments. ATF saw Judge was going to rule against the ATF so they withdrew charges in 2019!
    I do not understand how waking a criminal for owning something legal a week ago and not notified is allowing the individual’s rights to be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.
     

Share This Page