Thanks. I have been wondering just what your view was through your scope.
I have also been wondering if degradation/loss of resolution was a serious problem, but really it seems that you don't get full field of view until about 2.75x or so, and the view of the tire and suspension was excellent. I was looking for sipes in the tire, even at 6x!
Here's a Q: Comparing the IR Hunter MK II to the Apollo, does one have a larger screen relative to it's view as you look through it? I was a little surprised that the screen of the Apollo was so small compared to the size of the view.
I am considering either the Apollo or the 20mm 1.45 IR Hunter MK II (or maybe Patrol?) for all around use. Scanning, rifle scope and clip on as the need dictates. The day optic would be a Swarovski 1.1x4x24, with an illuminated reticle, or, if my son and I get a second AR, a 1.1x4x24 S&B, also with an illuminated reticle. Would you recommend one of the thermals over the other? If so, why?
Thanks for your time and effort teaching us all!
JPK